Zoe Kazan titties as she’s overwhelmed by Chinese Flying Kungfu… Amazing Origami Paper Plane makes F22/35/47 looks like lego fighter jets

China has made significant advancements in its fighter jet technology, but the U.S. still maintains an edge in several key areas. Here’s a comparison of Chinese and U.S. fighter jets in terms of technology, capabilities, and overall advancement:

1. 5th-Generation Fighters: J-20 vs. F-22 & F-35

• Chengdu J-20 (China)

  • Strengths:

    • Long-range, large payload capacity.

    • Designed for air superiority and strike missions.

    • Advanced AESA radar and IRST (Infrared Search & Track).

    • Stealth features, though likely not as refined as the F-22.

  • Weaknesses:

    • Engine technology lags (WS-15 still in development; currently uses WS-10C or Russian AL-31).

    • Stealth shaping and coatings may be less mature than U.S. counterparts.

    • Limited combat experience compared to U.S. jets.

• Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor (U.S.)

  

  • Strengths:

    • Best air dominance fighter in the world.

    • Supercruise capability (sustained supersonic flight without afterburner).

    • Superior stealth technology and sensor fusion.

  • Weaknesses:

    • Small fleet (only 186 built, now around 150 operational).

    • No longer in production; upgrades are limited.

• Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II (U.S.)

  

  • Strengths:

    • Three variants (A, B, C) for different missions.

    • Advanced sensor fusion and networking (best in the world).

    • Larger production numbers (over 1,000 delivered).

  • Weaknesses:

    • Less maneuverable than the J-20 or F-22 in dogfights.

    • High maintenance costs and some lingering software issues.

• Verdict:

  • The F-22 is still the best air superiority fighter, but its small numbers limit its impact.

  • The F-35 has better sensor fusion and multirole capability than the J-20.

  • The J-20 is a formidable rival, especially in the Asia-Pacific theater, but still relies on engine imports and has less combat-proven tech.

2. 4.5th-Generation Fighters: J-16/J-10C vs. F/A-18E/F & F-15EX

• Shenyang J-16 (China)

  • Derived from the Russian Su-30, but with Chinese AESA radar and advanced weapons.

  • Comparable to the F-15EX, but the U.S. jet has better engines and electronic warfare systems.

• Chengdu J-10C (China)

  

  • Lightweight multirole fighter with AESA radar and PL-15 missiles.

  • Similar to the F-16 Block 70/72, but the U.S. jet has more combat experience and better avionics.

• Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet & F-15EX Eagle II (U.S.)

  

  • More mature electronic warfare (EA-18G Growler is best in the world).

  • F-15EX carries more missiles than any Chinese fighter.

• Verdict:

  • U.S. 4.5th-gen jets have better avionics, networking, and combat experience.

  • Chinese jets are rapidly improving but still rely on some foreign tech (e.g., Russian engines for older models).

3. Upcoming Fighters: J-35 & NGAD

• Shenyang J-35 (China)

  • China’s second 5th-gen fighter (navy variant for carriers).

  • Likely to compete with the F-35C but may still lag in engine tech.

• U.S. Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD)

  • 6th-gen fighter in development (manned/unmanned teaming).

  • Expected to surpass anything China has in stealth, range, and AI-driven warfare.

4. Key Advantages for Each Side

• U.S. Advantages:

  • More combat-tested stealth fighters (F-22, F-35).

  • Better engine technology (F135, F119, upcoming AETP engines).

  • Superior sensor fusion and networking (Link 16, MADL).

  • Larger fleet of advanced 4.5th-gen jets (F-15EX, F/A-18E/F, F-16V).

• China’s Advantages:

  • Rapid production (J-20 numbers estimated at 200+, growing fast).

  • Long-range missiles (PL-15, PL-21) that challenge U.S. jets.

  • Home-field advantage in the Pacific (more bases, A2/AD systems).

Final Assessment:

• The U.S. still leads in overall fighter jet technology, especially in stealth, engines, and combat experience.

• China is closing the gap quickly, particularly in numbers and missile technology.

• By 2030, China could match or surpass the U.S. in some areas (e.g., fleet size), but the U.S. will likely retain an edge in quality and next-gen systems (NGAD, drones, AI).

Here’s a deep dive into the key technologies that will define 6th-generation fighter jets, comparing U.S. and Chinese advancements in critical areas:

---

1. Adaptive Cycle Engines: The Heart of 6th-Gen Performance

U.S. (AETP Program: XA100/XA101)

• Technology:

  • Three-stream adaptive engines that can switch between high thrust (for dogfighting) and fuel-efficient modes (for long-range strikes).

  • 30% longer range and 10% more thrust than current F135 engines (used in F-35).

  • Enhanced thermal management to power lasers and advanced sensors.

• Status:

  • GE’s XA100 and Pratt & Whitney’s XA101 have completed prototype testing.

  • Expected to equip NGAD by 2030.

China (WS-15 & Beyond)

• Technology:

  • WS-15 (for J-20) is China’s first high-thrust turbofan (~180 kN thrust), but still lags behind the F135 in reliability.

  • Next-gen engines may use adaptive bypass tech (similar to AETP), but details are scarce.

• Status:

  • WS-15 is operational but not yet mass-produced.

  • A 6th-gen engine is likely in early R&D (possibly WS-20 or a new design).

Verdict:

• U.S. leads decisively—AETP engines are years ahead in testing and performance.

• China’s bottleneck remains metallurgy and precision manufacturing for turbine blades.

2. Artificial Intelligence: The “Brain” of 6th-Gen Fighters

U.S. (Skyborg, ACE, and JADC2)

• Autonomous Dogfighting:

  • DARPA’s ACE (Air Combat Evolution) program trained AI to defeat human pilots in simulated F-16 dogfights (2024 trials).

  • Skyborg enables drones like XQ-58A to act as AI wingmen.

• Sensor Fusion:

  • JADC2 networks satellites, jets, and ships for real-time decision-making.

  • F-35’s ALIS/ODIN systems already use AI for predictive maintenance.

China (AI-Assisted Warfare)

• PLA’s “AI Generals”:

  • China is testing AI-driven command systems in J-16s to manage drone swarms.

  • Algorithmic warfare emphasized in PLA doctrine (e.g., AI jamming, cyber attacks).

• Limitations:

  • Less combat data to train AI compared to the U.S.

  • Relies on civilian AI giants (e.g., Baidu, Huawei) for dual-use tech.

Verdict:

• U.S. has more combat-tested AI, but China is closing the gap in swarm algorithms.

• Critical edge: U.S. AI is trained on real-world F-35/F-22 data; China’s is mostly simulated.

3. Stealth & Materials: Invisible Warfare

U.S. (NGAD’s “Radar Evasion 2.0”)

• New Coatings:

  • Nanocomposite paints that self-heal and adapt to radar frequencies.

  • IR Suppression: Advanced cooling to reduce heat signatures.

• Shape Optimization:

  • NGAD may use “faceted” designs beyond the F-35’s curves to deflect radar.

China (Metamaterials & Plasma Stealth)

• Metamaterials:

  • Research into “invisibility cloaks” (e.g., South China Morning Post reports on radar-absorbing structures).

• J-20 Upgrades:

  • Newer batches use improved RAM (radar-absorbent material) coatings.

• Plasma Stealth (Rumored):

  • Theoretical use of ionized gas to deflect radar—no confirmed deployment.

Verdict:

• U.S. has more reliable stealth tech, but China is experimenting aggressively.

• Wildcard: If China masters metamaterials first, it could leapfrog U.S. stealth.

4. Weapons: Hypersonics, Lasers, and Swarms

U.S.

• Hypersonics:

  • HAWC (Hypersonic Air-Launched Weapon) and HACM in testing (~Mach 5+).

• Directed Energy:

  • SHiELD laser pod for F-15s (tested in 2022); NGAD may integrate lasers.

• Drone Swarms:

  • Gremlins program (recoverable UAVs for electronic attack).

China

• Hypersonics:

  • PL-21 missile (reportedly Mach 6+) and air-launched DF-ZF.

• Electronic Warfare:

  • J-16D is a dedicated EW jet; future drones may specialize in jamming.

• Drone Swarms:

  • GJ-11 stealth drone and CH-7 could act as loyal wingmen.

Verdict:

• Hypersonics: China leads in deployment (already fielding DF-17).

• Lasers & Swarms: U.S. has more mature programs.

---

5. Quantum & Space Warfare (The Ultimate Wildcards)

• U.S.:

  • DARPA’s Blackjack (low-orbit satellites for real-time targeting).

  • Quantum radar research (but unconfirmed for NGAD).

• China:

  • Quantum communication satellites (Micius project).

  • Hypersonic spaceplanes (tested in 2021).

Verdict:

• Space integration will be critical—both nations are racing to dominate orbital warfare.

Final Assessment: Who Wins the 6th-Gen Race?

• Short-Term (2030): U.S. NGAD will likely debut first with superior engines, AI, and stealth.

• Long-Term (2035+): China could match or exceed U.S. capabilities if it solves engine/AI bottlenecks.

• X-Factors:

  • U.S. advantage: Decades of stealth/combat experience.

  • China’s advantage: Faster prototyping and no bureaucratic delays.

The development of 6th-generation fighter jets is the next frontier in aerial combat, with both the U.S. and China actively working on advanced programs. While neither country has officially unveiled a 6th-gen fighter yet, there are strong indications of their respective projects based on official statements, patents, and defense analysts’ reports.

U.S. 6th-Gen Fighter Programs

1. Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD)

• Status: In development (expected to enter service ~2030).

• Key Features (Expected):

  • Manned-Unmanned Teaming (Loyal Wingman Drones): NGAD will likely control autonomous drones (like the XQ-58A Valkyrie) for swarm attacks, electronic warfare, and reconnaissance.

  • Enhanced Stealth: Improved radar-absorbing materials and shaping to counter advanced infrared/radar systems.

  • Adaptive Cycle Engines (AETP): Next-gen engines (like GE’s XA100) will provide greater fuel efficiency, thrust, and thermal management.

  • AI & Advanced Sensors: AI-assisted piloting, sensor fusion, and possibly directed-energy weapons (lasers).

  • Networked Warfare: Fully integrated with Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) for real-time battlefield awareness.

2. F/A-XX (U.S. Navy’s 6th-Gen Fighter)

• Designed to replace the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, focusing on carrier operations.

• Expected to feature longer range (to counter China in the Pacific) and unmanned teaming capabilities.

China’s 6th-Gen Fighter Efforts

1. Rumored J-XX / H-XX Programs

• Status: Early development (estimated entry ~2035).

• Key Features (Expected):

  • Loyal Wingman Drones: Similar to NGAD, China is testing drone companions (like the GJ-11 stealth drone).

  • Super Stealth: Further optimized radar cross-section (RCS) reduction, possibly plasma stealth or metamaterials.

  • Next-Gen Engines (WS-15 successor): China is investing heavily in advanced turbofan engines to eliminate reliance on Russian tech.

  • Hypersonic Capability: Possible integration of scramjet or combined-cycle engines for extreme speed (Mach 5+).

  • AI & Quantum Radar: China is leading in AI research and may integrate quantum radar for better detection of stealth aircraft.

2. Potential Dark Eagle (H-20 Stealth Bomber Synergy)

• China’s H-20 stealth bomber (in development) may share 6th-gen tech with its future fighter.

• A long-range, “flying wing” design could influence China’s 6th-gen fighter’s aerodynamics.

Comparison: U.S. vs. China in 6th-Gen Development

Who’s Ahead?

• The U.S. is currently leading due to:

  • More advanced engine programs (AETP).

  • Proven combat drone integration (Skyborg, Valkyrie).

  • Decades of stealth and sensor fusion experience.

• China is closing the gap rapidly due to:

  • Heavy investment in AI, quantum tech, and hypersonics.

  • No export restrictions (unlike U.S. ITAR), allowing faster prototyping.

  • Large-scale production capability (could outnumber U.S. jets).

Future Outlook

• 2030s will be decisive—if the U.S. fields NGAD first, it will regain air dominance.

• China could surprise with an early 6th-gen prototype (as it did with the J-20).

• Hypersonic & space warfare may become part of 6th-gen combat (both nations are testing spaceplanes).