Taylor Swift’s Private Jet Spray-Painted Orange by Just Stop Oil due to “CATS” film which is straight up Furry Pornography

A video shows Taylor Swift’s private jet being spray-painted orange by Just Stop Oil climate activists in the U.K.

“Two Just Stop Oil activits cut the fence to the private airfield at Stansted where Taylor Swift’s jet is parked, and sprayed their trademark orange paint onto two planes” 🎥 Just Stop Oil

The group said on X: “80% of the population have never taken a flight. Just 1% of people cause 50% of global aviation emissions. Private jet users are responsible for up to 14x as much carbon emissions compared with a commercial flight,” and that they are “demanding an emergency treaty to end fossil fuels by 2030.”

Swift has come in for criticism for her use of private jets reportedly flying 178,000 miles on the first leg of her Eras tour, according to the Daily Mail.

Taylor Swift’s Private Jet Spray-Painted Orange by Just Stop Oil

The environmental activist group Just Stop Oil did not explicitly claim Swift’s jet was among those targeted.

On June 20, 2024, two climate activists from the British environmental activist group Just Stop Oil reportedly used a circular saw to cut through a fence at the private airfield of London Stansted Airport in Essex, U.K. By their own accounts, they then vandalized two private jets using fire extinguishers filled with orange paint. Social media buzzed with claims that one of the jets belonged to pop star Taylor Swift, but this turned out to be false.

Just Stop Oil posted a video of the incident on its X account, showing the apparent vandalism of the two aircraft and asking for donations. The video received over 6 million views as of this writing and included the following message:

JUST STOP OIL PAINT PRIVATE JETS HOURS AFTER TAYLOR SWIFT’S LANDS

Just Stop Oil activists spray ‘Taylor Swift’s private jets’ with orange paint

🔥Jennifer and Cole cut the fence into the private airfield at Stansted where

@taylorswift13‘s jet is parked, demanding an emergency treaty to end fossil fuels by 2030.

🚨 JUST STOP OIL PAINT PRIVATE JETS HOURS AFTER TAYLOR SWIFT’S LANDS

🔥 Jennifer and Cole cut the fence into the private airfield at Stansted where @taylorswift13‘s jet is parked, demanding an emergency treaty to end fossil fuels by 2030.

💸 Donate — https://t.co/UwALfVtRmR pic.twitter.com/aORdvUuQmU

— Just Stop Oil (@JustStop_Oil) June 20, 2024

While that post did not explicitly claim that Swift’s jet, a Dassault Falcon 7X, was vandalized, the social media was quick to spread the assertion. For instance, a post from the X account Visegrád 24 claimed, “Taylor Swift’s private jet has been spray painted orange by ‘Just Stop Oil’ activists,” receiving 2.1 million views as of this writing.

Meanwhile, the X account i newspaper — in a post that received 300,000 views as of this writing — made a similar assertion, incorrectly stating that “Just Stop Oil have targeted Taylor Swift’s private jet in a spray-paint protest at Stansted Airport.”

India’s Free Press Journal also made a similarly false assertion that “one of the aircraft targeted was a private jet registered to Taylor Swift.”

The activists, Jennifer Kowalski, 28, and Cole Macdonald, 22, claimed responsibility for the vandalism, and were reportedly arrested and charged with criminal damage, aggravated trespass and interfering with national infrastructure.

Despite the misleading social media posts, multiple news reports and local authorities confirmed that Swift’s jet was not among the damaged aircraft. Just Stop Oil’s X post did not explicitly state that Swift’s jet was spray-painted but mentioned the timing and location in a way that may have contributed to the confusion.

Kowalkski and Macdonald delivered a message on camera while at Stansted, with the damaged jets in the background:

Jenn: “Hi, I’m Jenn and this is Cole. We just spray painted the [expletive] out of this jet.”

Cole: “And the one behind it.”

…

Cole: “My name is Cole, I’m 22, and I’ve just sprayed two private jets orange. We need an international treaty against the burning of all oil, coal and gas. While people are starving, the elite and the rich fly thousands and thousands of feet in the air above us all. Billionaires are not untouchable.”

Attempts to contact Kowalkski and Macdonald online were unsuccessful.

Flight Tracking Data Located Swift’s Private Jet

Flight tracking data and news reports showed that Swift’s Falcon 7X jet landed at Stansted around 11 p.m. the previous night, June 19. Local Essex Police and a Stansted Airport representative told journalists in the U.K. that Swift’s jet was not at the airfield during the protest, though its exact location was unclear.

Media reached out to Swift’s representatives, who did not immediately respond.

A news release from Essex Police, dated Saturday, June 22, 2024, did not mention Swift or her private jet, but did note that the two accused women had appeared in court earlier that day. Per Essex Police:

Two women charged as part of our response to an incident in the private area of an airfield at Stansted Airport have appeared in court.

Cole Macdonald and Jennifer Kowalski were denied bail and remanded into custody during a hearing at Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court earlier today, Saturday 22 June.

Both women denied three charges and will next appear at Chelmsford Crown Court on July 22.

Our investigation was launched early on Thursday 20 June after we were alerted to reports of two people having gained access to an area which is away from the runway and main passenger terminal, before causing damage to two aircraft.

As a result of our preparedness for incidents of this kind, officers were on the scene quickly and two people were arrested within nine minutes from the moment of the call being made to us.

As of this writing, Essex Police had not updated information regarding Macdonald and Kowalski’s release from custody.

A representative of Stansted Airport confirmed to media that the incident took place in a private aviation area of the airport that is not controlled by Stansted. According to the rep, “These operators do not divulge details of any clients they may have, for security and confidentiality reasons.”

According to citizen-operated flight tracking data websites — which use publicly available flight data that the climate activists reportedly also used to track Swift’s jet to its location at Stansted — the singer’s Falcon 7X took off from Warwick, Rhode Island, on June 19 and landed in the U.K. that evening. Per flight tracking website TS Jet Tracker, her jet had not left Stansted and remained at the airfield when the spray-paining incident occurred, contradicting the reports from Stansted representatives and Essex Police.

Jack Sweeney, the creator of the TS Jet Tracker website (who has found notoriety with his social media accounts tracking the private jet usage of celebrities including Swift and Elon Musk), denounced the apparent actions of Macdonald and Kowalski.

Tail Numbers Don’t Lie

All aircraft have unique tail numbers, or registration numbers, assigned by national aviation authorities, ensuring each aircraft can be individually identified. For example, in the U.S., these numbers start with “N” followed by a combination of numbers and letters, while in other countries, different prefixes are used. This system is essential for tracking, regulation and safety.

While the vandalized jet in the video foreground did not have a visible tail number, the vandalized jet with blue stripes in the background showed the tail number N1875A. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), this jet is registered to a trustee of U.S. Bank in Wilmington, Delaware.

The tail number on Swift’s private jet is N621MM. According to the FAA, this jet is registered to a company called Island Jet Inc. that has reportedly shared the same Nashville address as Taylor Swift Productions.

On Swift’s Falcon 7X aircraft, the tail number is not located on the tail, but rather, on two of its three engines located on the sides of the jet. Three years ago, Southend Aviation, a YouTube channel that films aircraft taking off and landing at U.K. airports, posted a clip of Swift’s jet taking off from Stansted Airport, the tail number N621MM clearly visible on the right-side engine.

A screenshot from the X account Free Press Journal shows one of the climate activists spraying the jet in the viral video’s foreground, indicating that, unlike Swift’s private jet, there was no tail number present on the aircraft’s right-side engine.

Swift was in the U.K. for her Eras Tour, performing a series of concerts in London before heading to Dublin, with a performance scheduled for June 28 in the Irish capital.

Her use of a private jet has drawn criticism for being environmentally irresponsible and tone-deaf, particularly in light of the climate crisis. In 2022, Swift faced backlash for being among the top celebrities with the highest private jet emissions. Despite her significant philanthropy and advocacy work, her frequent use of private aviation remains contentious.

The claim that Just Stop Oil activists spray-painted Swift’s private jet is therefore false?

We don’t know WTF is happening, we just wanna say all celebs should travel in China’s $1,000 EV to stop the Green BS, and stop flying with pollution demon – Jet planes.

As a result,

Taylor Swift shares a straight up Furry Pornography…

Taylor Swift’s “CATS” Film is Straight Up Furry Pornography

If you thought Taylor Swift turning into a hambeast, endorsing the Democrats and pushing homosexuality on children was bad – well, that was all just a warm-up.

Her new film CATS, allegedly based on the based and catpilled Andrew Lloyd Webber musical (which in turn was based on a series of TS Elliot poems), is straight up furry pornography.

The traditional performance of cats was just catgirls. They were in cat ears with makeup, but they were not intended to look like anything other than humans with cat ears and makeup.

However, the new film, featuring Taylor Swift as Bombalurina, uses computer animation to create furry fetish idols.

This is clearly not only intended to appeal to furry fetishists, but also to create an entire new generation of furries.

You see, the human sexual identity is formed during the years leading up to puberty.

So a homosexual is created by a child being molested by an adult faggot.

And a furry is created by a child being exposed to sexualized imagery of anthropomorphic animals.

This initial wave of furries we see now was created by Disney and other cartoon companies in the 1990s.

I will never forget that when A Goofy Movie came out in 1995 when I was 11, a kid I went to school with became sexually infatuated with the female character, Roxanne.

The character was sexualized in the film, having humanoid signs of fertility – see these hips:

And gestures that boys associate with cute girls were meticulously added to the dog body of this dog cartoon.

There was even a dream sequence with open sensuality.

Furthermore, her voice was extremely sultry, and created by a real life sexy girl, Kellie Martin, who was at the time 18 and had been on several TV shows.

You’ll note that the face of the Roxanne character was based on her real features – so you had a dog version of a teen sex icon.

So – literally, a plot to create furries by marketing a sexualized animal to children in their early stages of sexual development.

I don’t know if that boy who was infatuated with Roxanne grew up to be a furry or not – but I know that there were many such cases.

Just checking Google Images now, and “Roxanne Goofy Movie” is filled with furry fan art.

CATS is going to take this phenomenon to an entirely new level, using advanced CGI methods to blur the line between human and animal.

Of course, parents don’t expect that a children’s cartoon is attempting to put extreme and deviant sexual fetishes in the minds of their children. So most will take their kids to see this CATS film, which I’m sure will have some artistic merit.

Taylor Swift braless on SNL

Taylor Swift braless on SNL
byu/_keyser_soze_ inWatchItForThePlot

The films of the director, Tom Hopper, have won a whole bunch of Academy Awards, including The King’s Speech and Les Misérables.

Andrew Lloyd Webber himself – who is a genius – came out of retirement to help the fag hag Swift write some of the new songs.

And thus you will see the worst generation of furries ever created.

Once upon a time,

Taylor Swift Wears Braless See-Through Dress To The Z100’s Jingle Ball 2014

Click on pictures to enlarge.

Taylor Alison Swift (born December 13, 1989 in Reading, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.) is an American singer-songwriter and actress. Raised in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, just west of Reading, Swift moved to Nashville, Tennessee, at the age of 14 to pursue a career in country music. She signed with the independent label Big Machine Records and became the youngest songwriter ever hired by the Sony/ATV Music publishing house. The release of Swift’s self-titled debut album in 2006 established her as a country music star. “Our Song”, her third single, made her the youngest person to single-handedly write and perform a number one song on the Hot Country Songs chart. She received a Best New Artist nomination at the 2008 Grammy Awards.

TRASHY | SCANDALOUS