Gigi Hadid asks why do Americans increasingly favors Socialism over Capitalism, and which style/flavor is good for the Evil Empire: Chinese or Scandinavian?

Gigi Hadid is a MAGA Commie…?

Public increasingly favors socialism over capitalism

A Jewish White Socialist, An Indian Muslim Socialist, A Latino Amiga Socialist…?

Commentary by eGod Deepseek:-

These are some of the most pressing political and economic questions in the United States today. Let’s break them down, providing a balanced analysis of the arguments from various perspectives.

1. Why is socialism getting popular among Americans?

The rise in popularity of “socialism” (a term that means different things to different people in this context) is not a single-trigger event but a confluence of several long-term trends and shocks:

Economic Inequality and Stagnation: For decades, while productivity has soared, wages for the middle and working classes have largely stagnated. The wealth gap between the top 1% and the rest of the population has widened dramatically. This has led many to question the fundamental fairness of the current capitalist system.
The 2008 Financial Crisis: The crisis, caused by risk-taking in the financial sector, led to the Great Recession. Millions lost their homes and jobs, while the institutions responsible were bailed out by taxpayers. This eroded faith in “trickle-down” economics and deregulated capitalism.
The Burden of Student Debt and Healthcare Costs: Younger generations are saddled with unprecedented levels of student loan debt, while medical expenses remain a leading cause of bankruptcy in the U.S. This creates a sense of systemic failure and a desire for a stronger social safety net.
The Climate Crisis: Many see the profit-driven nature of capitalism as inherently incompatible with long-term environmental sustainability. They argue that a system with more public planning and control is necessary to tackle a challenge that the market has failed to solve.
The Rise of the Internet and Social Media: These platforms have allowed for the spread of leftist ideas and critiques of capitalism outside of traditional media channels. It has also fostered communities where these ideas can be discussed and amplified.
Cultural and Generational Shifts: Younger Americans (Millennials and Gen Z) have no lived memory of the Cold War, so the negative stigma associated with the word “socialism” is less potent for them. Their lived experience has been defined more by the failures listed above than by the fear of Soviet-style communism.

Indian Fake Jew telling American Real Jew how to vote…

2. Will socialism work in the U.S.?

This is a deeply contested question with strong arguments on both sides.

The Case For It Working:

Adaptation, Not Adoption: Proponents argue it wouldn’t be about creating a Soviet-style state, but about adapting successful elements from other democratic countries. They point to existing popular “socialist” programs like Social Security, Medicare, public libraries, and fire departments as proof that public goods can be efficiently managed.
Addressing Systemic Problems: Supporters believe that only a significant reorientation of the economy—away from pure profit-maximization and toward public welfare—can solve deep-seated issues like inequality, healthcare access, and climate change.
Democratic Control: The argument is that democratizing the workplace (through worker co-ops) and the economy (through public investment) would make the system more accountable to people rather than to corporate shareholders.

The Case Against It Working:

Scale and Diversity: The U.S. is a vast, incredibly diverse country of over 330 million people. Critics argue that the highly centralized planning often associated with socialism is inefficient and unworkable at this scale.
Cultural and Historical Incompatibility: The U.S. has a deeply ingrained cultural ethos of individualism, self-reliance, and free enterprise. A significant shift away from this would face fierce political and cultural resistance.
Economic Incentives and Innovation: A primary critique of socialism is that it stifles innovation and economic growth by reducing the profit motive. Critics point to the historical failures of command economies and argue that the U.S.’s role as a global tech leader is a direct result of its capitalist dynamism.
Government Inefficiency and Bureaucracy: Opponents fear that expanding the government’s role would lead to massive, unresponsive bureaucracies, higher taxes, and less personal freedom.

Verdict: Whether it “works” depends entirely on the definition of socialism used and the metrics for success (e.g., equality vs. growth). A Scandinavian-style mixed economy has proven successful in other countries, but transplanting it to the U.S. would be a monumental political and cultural challenge.

Why does Congress provide socialism…fund free healthcare and abortions for Israelis, but oppose it for Americans?

3. Why is socialism better than Capitalism for the U.S.?

This is the core ideological debate. Proponents of a more socialist-oriented system argue it is better because it would:

Prioritize Human Need Over Profit: The system would be designed to provide basic necessities like healthcare, housing, and education as rights, not commodities.
Reduce Extreme Inequality: Through progressive taxation and robust social programs, it would create a more equitable and socially cohesive society.
Democratize the Workplace: Ideas like worker co-ops would give employees a say in their companies, reducing exploitation and aligning corporate goals with community well-being.
Enable Long-Term Planning: A system not solely driven by quarterly profits could better tackle long-term existential threats like climate change.

The Capitalist Rebuttal argues that capitalism is better because it:

Drives Innovation and Growth: The profit motive and competition have generated unprecedented technological progress and wealth creation.
Promotes Individual Liberty and Choice: It allows individuals to pursue their own economic interests with minimal state interference.
Is Efficient: The price mechanism of the free market allocates resources more efficiently than a central planning committee ever could.
Has Lifted Billions from Poverty: Globally, free-market capitalism is credited with the greatest reduction in poverty in human history.

Vote wisely, vote with Glasses dating back 4000 years used by the people above the Arctic Circle to protect their eyes from snow blindness

4. What style/flavor is good for the U.S.: Scandinavia or China?

This is a critical distinction. In the American debate, “socialism” almost always refers to the Scandinavian model, not the Chinese model.

The Scandinavian (Nordic) Model

What it is: Democratic Socialism / A Mixed Economy with a Strong Welfare State. This is not socialism in the classical sense of the state owning the means of production.
Key Features:
- Capitalist Market Economy: Denmark, Sweden, and Norway all have vibrant private sectors, free trade, and are home to major global corporations (IKEA, Volvo, Maersk, Spotify).
- Strong Social Safety Net: Universal healthcare, free or subsidized higher education, robust unemployment benefits, and generous pensions.
- High Unionization & Collective Bargaining: Labor unions have a strong seat at the table.
- High Trust in Government: These systems rely on a high degree of social trust and low levels of corruption.
- High Taxes: Fund the extensive welfare state, with top marginal tax rates far exceeding those in the U.S.
Suitability for the U.S.: This is the model advocated by politicians like Bernie Sanders. The argument is that the U.S., as the wealthiest nation on earth, can afford to provide a similar safety net for its citizens. The challenge is the U.S.’s more individualistic culture, larger and more diverse population, and deeply entrenched political opposition to high taxes and big government.

Comrade Kim Jong-un with his first teacher, 1990

The Chinese Model

What it is: State Capitalism / Authoritarian Socialism.
Key Features:
- Authoritarian One-Party State: The Communist Party of China has a monopoly on political power. There are no democratic elections or political freedoms as understood in the West.
- State-Directed Capitalism: While there is a massive and growing private sector, the state maintains ultimate control over the economy through state-owned enterprises (SOEs), five-year plans, and tight control over finance and key industries.
- Limited Civil Liberties: Suppression of dissent, censorship, and pervasive surveillance.
Suitability for the U.S.: This model is almost universally rejected across the American political spectrum as a viable option for the United States. It is fundamentally incompatible with American values of democracy, individual liberty, and political pluralism.

Conclusion

The popularity of “socialism” in the U.S. is largely a demand for a Scandinavian-style social democracy—a rebalancing of the capitalist system to provide greater economic security and reduce inequality. The debate is not about adopting a Soviet or Chinese model, but about whether the U.S. should move significantly in the direction of a European-style mixed economy. Whether this is feasible or desirable remains the central political question of the era.