Carla Gugino titties over new UFO video released by Rep. Eric Burlison, shows a UFO being hit by a Missile, the UFO continues flying!

Carla Gugino feels horny after watching the UFO giving the missile a middle finger?

New UFO Video released by Rep. Eric Burlison, shows a UFO being hit by a Missile, the UFO continues flying!

Bombshell new video shows US military’s direct hit on glowing UFO with hellfire missile

New UFO Video released by Rep. Eric Burlison, shows a UFO being hit by a Missile, the UFO continues flying!
byu/87LucasOliveira inDamnthatsinteresting

The Full Story: The “Gimbal” Incident and the Missile That Didn’t Bother the UFO

The story begins not with a single video, but within the hallowed halls of the U.S. Congress. For years, a movement led by a bipartisan group of lawmakers, including Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO), has been pushing for greater transparency from the U.S. government on the issue of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), the modern term for UFOs.

Their efforts culminated in a now-famous hearing on July 26, 2023, before the House Oversight Committee’s Subcommittee on National Security. During this hearing, three credible whistleblowers, including former Air Force intelligence officer David Grusch, testified under oath about the existence of longstanding covert programs that have retrieved and reverse-engineered non-human craft.

The Context: A Fight for Transparency

Rep. Burlison, a member of this subcommittee, has been a vocal advocate for declassifying more UAP evidence. He argues that the excessive secrecy surrounding the topic is unnecessary for national security and prevents scientific and congressional oversight.

Months after the hearing, as part of his continued push for disclosure, Burlison released a specific clip to the public. He did this to illustrate the kind of evidence that exists and is being withheld from the American people.

Military whistleblowers revealed never-before-discussed encounters with UFOs, including the often reported Tic-Tac craft (pictured)

The Video: What It Actually Shows

The video itself is not new in the sense of being previously unknown; it is a cleaned-up, stabilized, and zoomed-in version of a segment of the “Gimbal” video, one of three famous UAP videos officially released by the U.S. Navy in 2020. The original Gimbal video was recorded by a fighter jet’s advanced targeting pod off the east coast of the U.S. in 2015.

The key moment Rep. Burlison highlighted occurs over just a few seconds:

1. The Object: The video shows a mysterious, oblong object (the now-famous “Gimbal” UAP) hovering or moving against the wind. It appears to lack any conventional control surfaces or propulsion system.

2. The “Missile”: From the bottom of the frame, a fast-moving projectile streaks upward towards the object. This is the moment that has caused the most controversy.

3. The Non-Reaction: The projectile appears to pass directly through or near the object. Crucially, the UFO shows no change in trajectory, speed, or behavior. It does not explode, evade, or show any damage. It simply continues on its path as if nothing happened.

The Central Mystery: What Was Fired?

This is the core of the debate. The official explanation from the Pentagon and military analysts is that the “missile” is not a missile at all. They argue it is a smoke trail from a countermeasure flare launched by another aircraft in the formation, which is out of the frame.

• The Skeptical View: Proponents of this view state that the angle and parallax effect make it seem like the flare is heading toward the UAP when, in reality, it is falling away behind the jet that filmed it. The UAP’s lack of reaction, in this case, is because nothing actually hit it; the flare was simply in the foreground of the shot.

• The UAP Perspective: Rep. Burlison and others interpreting the video as showing an impact argue that the trajectory and speed of the projectile are inconsistent with a slowly falling flare. They posit that it could have been an air-to-air missile that failed to detonate, was evaded with technology we don’t understand, or simply passed through a non-physical or intensely durable object. The object’s complete indifference is presented as evidence of technology far beyond our own.

The Significance and Aftermath

Regardless of the interpretation, Rep. Burlison’s release of the enhanced video served its purpose: it reignited public debate.

1. A Member of Congress Legitimized the Question: A sitting U.S. Representative presented a video to the public with the implication that it shows a advanced craft demonstrating impossible technology. This moves the discussion from the fringe to the mainstream political arena.

2. It Highlighted the “Gimbal” Incident’s Strangeness: The video focuses attention on one of the most puzzling aspects of the Gimbal encounter—the object’s apparent invulnerability, which was previously discussed anecdotally but now had a visual, though debated, component.

3. It Demanded Answers: By releasing it, Burlison was effectively saying, “This is the evidence we are seeing behind closed doors. The public deserves an explanation for what this is. Is it a flare, or is it something that can shrug off a missile?”

Conclusion: An Unresolved Puzzle

The full story of Rep. Eric Burlison’s video is not a story with a conclusion. It is a chapter in an ongoing, real-life mystery.

It is a story about a congressional effort to force transparency on a subject shrouded in secrecy for decades. The video itself remains a Rorschach test: to some, it is clear evidence of advanced technology; to others, it is a simple case of optical illusion and misidentification.

The only point of agreement is that the object in the video is a genuine UAP—it is unidentified. Whether it was hit by a missile or a flare, and why it didn’t react, remains one of the most compelling questions at the heart of the modern UAP discourse.

As a result,

TRASHY | SCANDALOUS

Carla Gugino Leaks Nude Scenes From “Sin City”…

Carla Gugino Nude Scenes From “Sin City” Colorized

The video below features actress Carla Gugino’s nude scenes from the film “Sin City” colorized for the first time.

Why a film that shamelessly glorifies a festering pit of degeneracy like “Sin City” dared to capture Carla’s bare flesh in drab black and white to begin with was an utterly brainless blunder, and one that the moral MAGAs have just mercifully rectified.

For while a woman showing off her blasphemous body in monochrome is undoubtedly a sin, there is just something about seeing Carla’s chesticles in radiant technicolor that truly hammers home just how much of a demonically depraved gutter skank she is in this movie.

🍆 More 🍌 Sextapes 💦 Page 2 ⬇️